The debate on a market for living organ vendors is mainly an academic debate, not a debate within the public or die legislative bodies. In this debate, and certainly among the proponents of market solutions, the distinction between the (relevant) presentation of a rational argument and the (irrelevant) appeal to widely shared intuitions is more strictly cultivated than it would be die case within a political debate. The present article argues that this distinction, while having its merits, has its limits even in die academic debate and does not lead to an academic defeat of die opponents of a market for organs.
Enthalten in:
Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik; 2009/1 Kommentare, Studien, Berichte, Dokumentationen, Diskussionen, Rezensionen, Bibliographie
(2009)
Serie / Reihe: Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik
Personen: Lübbe, Weyma
Lübbe, Weyma:
Rationalität und gefühlte Überzeugungen : ein Kommentar zur bioethischen Argumentationskultur am Beispiel der Debatte über die Monetarisierung der Organlebendspende / von Weyma Lübbe, 2009. - S.23-33 - (Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik)
Zeitschriftenartikel